“And without controversy great is the mystery of godliness: God was manifest in the flesh, justified in the Spirit, seen of angels, preached unto the Gentiles, believed on in the world, received up into glory.” 1Timothy 3:16

.INTRODUCTION.

As the scripture demonstrates on Jeremiah 8:8 “How do ye say, we are wise, and the law of the LORD is with us? Lo, certainly in vain made he it; the pen of the scribes is in vain.”

Many religious people are writing on different topics of religious matters more than in any other century in the past. Since most of these topics are denied the law of the Lord, it seems they are writing only because they are badly hungry to express their own personal feelings, with out giving enough time to be in harmony with the word of God. According to the prophecy of prophet Jeremiah, thaese kinds of literatures are classified as the vain pen of the scribes. On this short literature I would like to bring out the misunderstandings and misinterpretation of one of “the vain pen of the scribes” of 21st century, which is named “Global Good News Literature
(GGNL)”
{www.globalgoodnews.org/only_jesus.htm }
.For this reason I prefer to use the abbreviation "GGNL" to identify their literature and humbly render my short review, which is presented to refute the literature written by GGNL on the topic of:

1. Oneness of God

2. Oneness doctrine concerning water baptism.

This review will concentrate on the first topic and I will print out the review of the second topic as soon as possible.

.1.1 The plural words of the Bible

According to GGNL the plural words of Genesis 1:26, 3:22 and Isa 6:8 refers to the plurality of distinct personalities in the Godhead. However none of the Hebrew scholars and those who did proper research on these verses has never ever understood as the 21st century writers of GGNL.

..Genesis 1:26..

“And God said, Let us make man in our imagea, after our likeness: and let them have dominion over the fish of the sea, and over the fowl of the air, and over the cattle, and over all the earth, and over every creeping thing that creepeth upon the earth. So God created man in his own image, in the image of God created he him; male and female created he them.” Genesis 1:26 & 27

In order to understand this verse as it meant to be, I am going to approach it from four different angles, which will help us to obtain the truth of the verse.

I. Does plurality of a word, necessarily shows plurality of distinct personalities?

Since the Bible is the plan, idea, command of the Almighty God, it is unwise to use our human dictionary to interpret the divine expressions of the Bible. Let’s see some of the usage of plural words in the Bible:

“This is the dream; and we will tell the interpretation thereof before the king.” Daniel 2:36. If we conclude plural words of the Bible always meant to prove the plurality of distinct personalities, then did Prophet Daniel has three or more distinct personalities?

“And he received them at their hand, and fashioned it with a graving tool, after he had made it a molten calf: and they said, These be thy gods, O Israel, which brought thee up out of the land of Egypt.” Exodus 32:4. If we conclude plural words of the Bible always meant to prove the plurality of distinct personalities, then did this calf has three or more distinct personalities? I don’t serve aa God who has lesser value than a molten calf.

“And she said, Who would have said unto Abraham, that Sarah should have given children suck? for I have born him a son in his old age.” Genesis 21:7. If we conclude plural words of the Bible always meant to prove the plurality of distinct personalities, then did Isaac has three or more distinct personalities?

Since the plural words used in all these verses don’t show plurality of distinct personalities, I would like to confirm that I don’t worship a God who has much lesser value than Daniel, a calf and Isaac. Even though the Bible used plural words for prophet Daniel, for a calf and Isaac, yet do not caused distinct plural personalities, then what is the big deal when the Bible uses the same to the Almighty God, the creator and the owner of everything. As we have seen, these Bible verses prove that plural words of the Bible do not show necessarily plurality of distinct personalities.

II.The meaning of the plural word El-o-heem

If we are desperate to understand what the scripture says only, it is very wise for some one to research and refer to the etymology of the Hebrew word El-o-heem. When we let our subconscious to understand the word of God not in the way we want but the truth, we can be able to get the understanding as it was meant by the Bible writers. When we study the Hebrew word “El-o-heem” that caused the plural translation of Genesis 1:26, does not show distinct plural personalities in the God Head. According to Logos New and Old Testament in aHebrew/Greek, in connection with the Almighty God, the definition is “plural intensive singular meaning indicating special possessions of God”. The plural words of Genesis 1:26 does not show the plurality of distinct personalities in the God head rather the plurality of special possessions of the Almighty God.

III. Scriptures that shows the singleness of the personality of God.

“See now that I, even I, am he, and there is no God with me: I kill, and I make alive; I wound, and I heal: neither is there any that can deliver out of my hand.” Due 32:39

· With God there is no another distinct personality of God!

“Thus saith the LORD, thy redeemer, and he that formed thee from the womb, I am the LORD that maketh all things; that stretcheth forth the heavens alone; that spreadeth abroad the earth by myself;” Isa 44:24

· He is alone by himself; there are no distinct plural personalities in Godhead.

“Thus saith the LORD the King of Israel, and his redeemer the LORD of hosts; I am the first, and I am the last; and beside me there is no God.” Isa 44:6

· There is no distinct personality of the Godhead beside the so called other personality of God.

“Fear ye not, neither be afraid: have not I told thee from that time, and have declared it? ye are even my witnesses. Is there a God beside me? yea, there is no God; I know not any.” Isa 44:8

· The so called distinct plural personality of God, who is beside the other personality of God, is not known by the Almighty God.

“Remember the former things of old: for I am God, and there is none else; I am God, and there is none like me,” Isa 46:9

· There are no distinct plural personalities in the Godhead, who are like God or who are identified as the other personality of the God Head.

“Thou, even thou, art LORD alone; thou hast made heaven, the heaven of heavens, with all their host, the earth, and all things that are therein, the seas, and all that is therein, and thou preservest them all; and the host of heaven worshippeth thee.” Neh 9:6

· He is alone by himself; there are no distinct plural personalities in the Godhead.

If we are willing to accept the truth, it is clear in these scriptures that there are no distinct personalities in the Godhead. If God has three distinct personalities, then how come these all scriptures of the Bible demonstrate the singleness of the personality of the Almighty God? As we have seen on the above verses the adjectives and adverbs that God uses in terms of expressing Himsealf, do not allow the so called doctrine of distinct plural personalities, rather it clarifies the singleness of the personality in the God head. Since all these scriptures telling us clearly the single personality of our God, the teaching of GGNL is going to be classified as negating the word of the Almighty God and ego-centric pagan doctrine.

IV. The fact that Man is created in the likeness of God.

“So God created man in his own image, in the image of God created he him; male and female created he them.” Genesis 1:27

Together with the above three points, the creation fact also contributes an additional point that clarifies the single personality of our God. Since man is created having single personality with body, soul and spirit, there is no any reason to believe distinct personalities in the Godhead. As man has body, soul and spirit unlikely the Almighty God can be explained as Father, Son and Holy Ghost but being single in personality as Adam is. At least GGNL suppose to accept this primary truth of Genesis, as it clams itself as good news propagator.

From the above four angles of studying the truth about Genesis 1:26, we can obtain pure understanding and protect our soul from “the vain pen of the scribes”. It would be good if GGNL is willing to be advised that there are no so called distinct plural personalities in the God head but plurality of His special possessions.

..Genesis 3:22..

“And the LORD God said, Behold, the man is become as one of us, to know good and evil: and now, lest he put forth his hand, and take also of the tree of life, and eat, and live for ever: Therefore the LORD God sent him forth from the garden of Eden, to till the ground from whence he was taken. So he drove out the man; and he placed at the east of the garden of Eden Cherubims, and a flaming sword which turned every way, to keep the way of the tree of life.” Genesis 3:22-24

The event of Genesis three elaborates that Adam sinned against the Holy God, which means the first man Adam added sinfulness in to his nature, which supposed to be as he was created in the likeness of God.

“Lo, this only have I found, that God hath made man upright; but they have sought out many inventions.” Eccl 7:29

This scripture proves that Man was created being upright but he started to seek many inventions for himself. It is a blasphemy to wards the Almighty God to teach that at the event of Genesis chapter three Adam became as one of the Holy distinct personalities in the God head. While we see the fact of Genesis chapter three demonstrates that God caught Adam, while he was rebelling against the Holy God. It was on Genesis 1:27 the first man, Adam joined the likeness of God but at the event of Genesis three Adam joined some angelic personalities through rebellion, adding sinfulness in to his nature. As the teaching of GGNL Adam became as one of thea distinct personalities in the God head in the 3rd chapter of Genesis. Didn’t Adam was in the perfect likeness of God before he added sinfulness in to his nature through rebellion?, Did one of the distinct personalities of God rebel against Himself before Adam rebelled against God, at the event of Genesis chapter three? God forbid this!!!!!

The event of Genesis three brings out the fact that there were personalities, who were in company with God and rebelled against God before Adam and then Adam became as one of these personalities when he rebelled against God at the event of Genesis three. I don’t think we need our lexicography to identify these personalities who rebelled against God before Adam; however the following verses will make it clear.

“Behold, he put no trust in his servants; and his angels he charged with folly:” Job 4:18

“And the angels which kept not their first estate, but left their own habitation, he hath reserved in everlasting chains under darkness unto the judgment of the great day.” Jud 1:6

..Genesis 11:7..

“Go to, let us go down, and there confound their language, that they may not understand one another's speech. So the LORD scattered them abroad from thence upon the face of all the earth: and they left off to build the city. ” Genesis 11: 7 & 8

Since the Bible is not esoteric, we can not be confused to understand this verse. Even though GGNL never mentioned this verse, I am strongly convinced that it is good to show for the readers of this literature the truth of Genesis 11:7 as well, since some of the believers of trinity quote this verse to prove their so called doctrine of plural personalities. Apparently it is also another blasphemy to misconstrue this verse to teach as ‘God was calling His distinct personalities to come in order to go down and confound the language of the people, who were building the tower of Babylon’. Did these distinct plural personalities were living far from each other, to the extent of to be called by one of the distinct personality? God forgive this!!!!

The Bible does not speak about the so called distinct personalities in the God Head, who are needed to be called in order to come together and accomplish something. Let’s see what the Bible says:-

“For the Father himself loveth you, because ye have loved me, and have believed that I came out from God” John 16:27

“Now are we sure that thou knowest all things, and needest not that any man should ask thee: by this we believe that thou camest forth from God.” John 16:30

“Jesus said unto them, If God were your Father, ye would love me: for I proceeded forth and came from God; neither came I of myself, but he sent me.” John 8:42

Because of the above scriptural fact, the son was not distinct personality different from the father but the son was the word that proceeded from the father and became flesh.

“And when he had said this, he breathed on them, and saith unto them, Receive ye the Holy Ghost:” John 20:22

“The Spirit of God hath made me, and the breath of the Almighty hath given me life.” Job 33:4

“And I will lay sinews upon you, and will bring up flesh upon you, and cover you with skin, and put breath in you, and ye shall live; and ye shall know that I am the LORD….And shall put my spirit in you, and ye shall live, and I shall place you in your own land: then shall ye know that I the LORD have spoken it, and performed it, saith the LORD.” Ezekiel 37:6 & 14.

“But when the Comforter is come, whom I will send unto you from the Father, even the Spirit of truth, which proceedeth from the Father, he shall testify of me:” John 15:26

Because of the above scriptural fact, we can clearly see that the Holy Spirit is not distinct personality different from the father but the Holy Spirit always proceeds from the father.

We always need to open our heart and mind in order to get aa clear understanding of the word of God as it meant to be. Since God is a spirit, what does it mean when God said “Go to, let us go down”? Is it Biblical to think that the Omni present God was not on the earth until He came down with His so called distinct personalities? If we don’t want to inviolable the word of God, we must allow the Bible to interpret itself. When we study the book of Genesis there are two events that God wanted to “go down”, on chapter 11 and 18. From these chapters we can understand that when the Omni-present God uses the phrase “let’s go down”, it is only referring the activity of the Almighty God with His angelic Company. See Genesis 18:21.

“And the LORD said, Because the cry of Sodom and Gomorrah is great, and because their sin is very grievous; I will go down now, and see whether they have done altogether according to the cry of it, which is come unto me; and if not, I will know. And the men turned their faces from thence, and went toward Sodom: but Abraham stood yet before the LORD.” Genesis 18:20-22.

“And there came two angels to Sodom at even; and Lot sat in the gate of Sodom: and Lot seeing them rose up to meet them; and he bowed himself with his face toward the ground;” Genesis 19:1.

“Go to, let us go down, and there confound their language, that they may not understand one another's speech. So the LORD scattered them abroad from thence upon the face of all the earth: and they left off toa build the city.” Genesis 11:7-8

N/B: God wanted to go down to Sodom and Gomorrah but in the practical reality there were His angelic companies that had gone to Sodom and Gomorrah. Since God is a spirit, who is omni-present, there is no such thing like “down” and “up” for His presence. John 4:24, Ps 139:7-12, Jer 23:23-24.

.. Isaiah 6:8..

“Also I heard the voice of the Lord, saying, Whom shall I send, and who will go for us? Then said I, Here am I; send me.” Isa 6:8

From its beginning the book of Isaiah portrays that the prophet was seeing his prophecy through vision. “The vision of Isaiah the son of Amoz, which he saw concerning Judah and Jerusalem in the days of Uzziah, Jotham, Ahaz, and Hezekiah, kings of Judah.” Isa 1:1

GGNL claims that the plural word on Isaiah 6:8 shows the distinct plural personalities in the God head. If we are not adamant to accept the Biblical truth, it is clearly stated that who were those distinct plural personalities in the vision of Isaiah. The 8th verse of Isaiah makes it clear that Only one person has the authority of sending, then we should ask a very simple Question, who were these other personalities having no authority of sending?

The distinct personalities of Isaiah six can be understood, if we are willing to escape fraom the snare of GGNL, which quoted only verse 8 not mentioning the full event of Isaiah Chapter six.

“In the year that king Uzziah died I saw also the Lord sitting upon a throne, high and lifted up, and his train filled the temple. Above it stood the seraphims: each one had six wings; with twain he covered his face, and with twain he covered his feet, and with twain he did fly. And one cried unto another, and said, Holy, holy, holy, is the LORD of hosts: the whole earth is full of his glory. And the posts of the door moved at the voice of him that cried, and the house was filled with smoke. Then said I, Woe is me! for I am undone; because I am a man of unclean lips, and I dwell in the midst of a people of unclean lips: for mine eyes have seen the King, the LORD of hosts. Then flew one of the seraphim unto me, having a live coal in his hand, which he had taken with the tongs from off the altar: And he laid it upon my mouth, and said, Lo, this hath touched thy lips; and thine iniquity is taken away, and thy sin purged. Also I heard the voice of the Lord, saying, Whom shall I send, and who will go for us? Then said I, Here am I; send me. And he said, Go, and tell this people, Hear ye indeed, but understand not; and see ye indeed, but perceive not. Make the heart of this people fat, and make their ears heavy, and shut their eyes; lest they see with their eyes, and hear with their ears, and understand with their heart, and convert, and be healed.” Isaiah 6:1-9.

When we see this verse in the scope of the whole event of the Chapter, it makes much easier toa identify the personalities around the throne of God, who do not have the authority of sending. Let’s compare this with the vision of prophet Micah:

“And he said, Hear thou therefore the word of the LORD: I saw the LORD sitting on his throne, and all the host of heaven standing by him on his right hand and on his left.” 1kings 22:19.

In the visionary realm of heaven, prophet Micah saw that who were the distinct personalities around the throne of God. He never saw the so called God the Son( the 2nd person God) and God the Holy Ghost( the 3rd person God) by the right and left side of God respectively or visa versa as the GGNL doctrine of distinct plural personalities. From these Biblical perspective we clearly understood that the personalities around the throne of God , who do not have the authority of sending were none other than angelic personalities, as we can see on the given verse seraphim were the only distinct personalities at the event of Isaiah chapter six.

N/B: Don’t say more than what the scripture say!

.1.2 Does the Conjunction “with” necessarily shows distinctions of Personalities?

At this stage GGNL needs to study the word of God before generalizing the usage of the conajunction “with” and preferring to use its human lexicography to explain the Bible more than the Bible itself. Let’s see some of the usage of the conjunction “with” in the Bible:

“Dominion and fear are with him, he maketh peace in his high places.” Job 25:2.

“But flesh with the life thereof, which is the blood thereof, shall ye not eat.” Genesis 9:4.

“Even the Spirit of truth; whom the world cannot receive, because it seeth him not, neither knoweth him: but ye know him; for he dwelleth with you, and shall be in you.” John 14:17

“The LORD reigneth, he is clothed with majesty; the LORD is clothed with strength, wherewith he hath girded himself: the world also is stablished, that it cannot be moved.”Ps 93:1.

“Let us come before his presence with thanksgiving, and make a joyful noise unto him with psalms.” Ps 95:2.

Since the conjunction “with” does not show the distinction of personalities on the above scripatures, from this fact we can be able to understand that the conjunction “with” does not necessarily prove the distinction of personalities all the time.

.1.3 Do “Personal pronouns” necessarily show distinct personalities?

“As for God, his way is perfect: the word of the LORD is tried: he is a buckler to all those that trust in him.” Ps 18:30.

“Every word of God is pure: he is a shield unto them that put their trust in him. Add thou not unto his words, lest he reprove thee, and thou be found a liar.” Pro 30:6.

“Take fast hold of instruction; let her not go: keep her; for she is thy life.” Pro 4:13.

Since the “personal pronounces” do not show distinct of personalities on the above scriptures, from this fact we can simply understand that the personal pronounces do not necessarily prove the distinct personalities all the time.

.1.4 Does the Conjunction “and” necessarily shows the distinctions of Personalities?

“Mine heart within me is broken becausea of the prophets; all my bones shake; I am like a drunken man, and like a man whom wine hath overcome, because of the LORD, and because of the words of his holiness” Jer 23:9.

“And now, brethren, I commend you to God, and to the word of his grace, which is able to build you up, and to give you an inheritance among all them which are sanctified.” Acts 20:32.

“Finally, my brethren, be strong in the Lord, and in the power of his might.” Ephesus 6:10.

“And we know that the Son of God is come, and hath given us an understanding, that we may know him that is true, and we are in him that is true, even in his Son Jesus Christ. This is the true God, and eternal life” 1John 5:20.

“Thus saith the LORD the King of Israel, and his redeemer the LORD of hosts; I am the first, and I am the last; and beside me there is no God.” Isa 44:6.

“And I saw an angel come down from heaven, having the key of the bottomless pit and a great chain in his hand. And he laid hold on the draagon, that old serpent, which is the Devil, and Satan, and bound him a thousand years,” Rev 20:1 & 2.

“And Thomas answered and said unto him, My Lord and my God. “ John 20:28

“Jesus saith unto him, I am the way, the truth, and the life: no man cometh unto the Father, but by me.” John 14:6.

Since the conjunction “and” does not show the distinction of personalities on the above scriptures, from this fact we can be able to understand that the conjunction “and” does not necessarily prove distinctions of personalities all the time, rather we can realize that it has been used also to lighten the different aspect of the same thing or person.

.1.5 Who gave Who?

“For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life” John 3:16.

According to GGNL this scripture was interpreted as “God the father gave God the son for the salivation of the world”. Then we are going to be forced to ask a question like, did God gave His God or His Son for our salvation? This confusion of GGNL came because it never gave the opportunity of interpretation for the Bible itself; rataher GGNL chooses to multiply Gods. According to GGNL, if God the father (the first person God) gave His second person God (God the Son), then GGNL actually saying that God gave His God for our salvation. Now GGNL would undoubtedly reject any suggestion of such thinking or such conclusion, but the “God gave His God (His second person God) theory of GGNL” inevitably leads to worship multiple Gods.

N/B: The Bible does not say that God gave His God but His Son.

What does the message of John 3:16 “For God so loved the world that he gave his only begotten Son” mean? According to the Bible, God never gave the so called second person God or His God for our salvation rather He gave His Son. If the Bible said God gave His Son, then we should study the implication of the term “Son” from Biblical perspective.

“For if, when we were enemies, we were reconciled to God by the death of his Son, much more, being reconciled, we shall be saved by his life.” Romans 5:10.

“And you, that were sometime alienated and enemies in your mind by wicked works, yet now hath he reconciled. In the body of his flesh through death, to present you holy and unblameable and unreproveable in his sight:” Col 1:21 & 22.

If we give attention for the above verses of the Bible, the same Apostle that God used in order to wriate Romans, he was the same to write Colossians. In these verses, it is clear that the term “Son” is explained by Apostle Paul to be understood as the body of the flesh of God. If this is so with Apostle Paul, I don’t think it is good for us to use our lexicography and try to explain in any other different way.

“I am the living bread which came down from heaven: if any man eat of this bread, he shall live for ever: and the bread that I will give is my flesh, which I will give for the life of the world.” John 6:51.

For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son… but have everlasting life John 3:16.

We can understand what Jesus meant on John 3:16, for Jesus Himself explained it on John 6:51. The only thing GGNL needs to do is, not to stretch itself more than what the scripture interprets itself and willingness to stop its personal interpretation, which says God gave His God (second person God) for the life of the world. How ever it is very clear in the above verses, when the Bible says “God gave his son to die for the life of the world” it means only “God gave his flesh (body)to die for the life of the world” as we compared the above verses.

“As concerning therefore the eating of those things that are offered in sacrifice unto idols, we know that an idol is nothing in the world, and that there is none other God but one. For though there be that arae called gods, whether in heaven or in earth, (as there be gods many, and lords many,) But to us there is but one God, the Father, of whom are all things, and we in him; and one Lord Jesus Christ, by whom are all things, and we by him.” 1Cor 8:4- 6.

According to this scripture, there is only one God, the father, then the Son can only be called “God” in terms of referring to God the father who is manifested in His Son but not being distinct from the father, for the Bible says “the Son can do nothing by himself John 5:19. If the term “Son” refers to God directly and the Bible says the “Son” died for our sin, then we could say God died on the cross of Calvary, but it is a universal and Biblical fact that God being a Spirit can not die. In order to be in harmony with the general Biblical perspective and truth, the direct implication of the term “Son” should be only the body of the flesh of the Almighty God, who was died for our sin. One more point that I realized from the writers of GGNL is, they seems do not know or they are purposely neglecting the principle of “the inside by the out side”, which is commonly used almost in many circumstances globally. But I would like to show how this principle also used in the Bible. Let’s see the following examples:

The Bible demonstrates as people killed the souls of other people in many passages of the Bible (Ezekiel 13:19, Rev.16:3), since the Bible tells us in the Gospel of Matthew that no one can kill a soul but only flesh, then this shows us only the principle of “the insaide by the out side” is also being used in the Bible. Mat 10: 28.

“Or if a soul touch any unclean thing, whether it be a carcase of an unclean beast, or a carcase of unclean cattle, or the carcase of unclean creeping things, and if it be hidden from him; he also shall be unclean, and guilty.” Lev. 5:2. How could soul touch the material world, if it is not through the principle of “the inside by the out side”?

“And whatsoever man there be of the house of Israel, or of the strangers that sojourn among you, that eateth any manner of blood; I will even set my face against that soul that eateth blood, and will cut him off from among his people” Lev. 17:10. How could soul eat material blood, if it is not through the principle of “the inside by the out side”?

“And whoso shall swear by the temple, sweareth by it, and by him that dwelleth therein.” Mat 23:21. “Jesus answered and said unto them, Destroy this temple, and in three days I will raise it up.Then said the Jews, Forty and six years was this temple in building, and wilt thou rear it up in three days? But he spake of the temple of his body” John 2:19-21.The Bible tells us that the body of Christ is “temple”. There fore when we call the “Son” being “God”, we are actually reaferring to the father that dwells in the “Son”, as Jesus said the father dwells in me (John 14:10).

. A Brief Summery

Since the Bible writers were strictly monotheistic, there is no any normal point for the Church to endorse the pagan concept of Trinity, man made doctrine of the 4th century and the 21st century doctrine of “Twins in the God Head”, which is presented by GGNL. Since God presented Himself as one, indivisible, no distinction in Him and with out having none like Him, it is a bold blasphemy to create the so called doctrine of Twins. Further more GGNL explained that One God(One Person) believers teach that Holy spirit is the activity of God, since we don’t believe the Holy spirit as the activity of God, I left out this point as the misunderstanding or misconstrue of GGNL rather we believe that the Holy Spirit is God Himself in activity.

1. If Holy Spirit has distinct personality from the father, then why the Bible says that Holy Spirit proceeds from the father, proving that Holy Spirit is not distinct person from the father? John 15:26.

2. If Holy Spirit has distinct personality from Jesus, then why the Bible says that Jesus breathed Holy Spirit in to His disciples, proving that Holy Spirit is not distinct person from Jesus? John 20:21.

3. If the Holy spirit is a different and distinct personality from Jesus, then why the Bible used the Graeek word “allos”(the same sort in different form) but not “hetros” (different thing from different or distinct sort), proving that Holy Spirit is not distinct person by himself but Jesus(God) Himself in different form? John 14:16.

4. If Jesus has distinct personality from the father, then why the Bible says that the Son can do nothing of Himself, proving that Jesus is not distinct person from the father? John 5:19.

5. If Jesus has distinct personality from the father, then how could Jesus answered for the question “where is your father?” by saying “I am He”, proving that Jesus is not distinct person from the father? John 8:19 & 24.

6. If Jesus has distinct personality from the father, then why the Bible says that Jesus proceeded from the father, proving that Jesus is not distinct person from the father? John 8:42.

7. If Jesus has distinct personality from the father, then why the Bible says that Jesus himself is the father, proving that Jesus is not distinct person from the father? Isa 9:6.

8. If Jesus has distinct personality from the father, then why the Bible says that all the fullness of the God Head dwells in Jesus bodily, proving that Jesus is not distinct person from the father? Col 2:9.

9. If Jesus has distinct personality from the father, then why the Bible saays that there is a name, which only Jesus Himself knows it, proving that Jesus is not distinct person from the father? Rev 19:11.

10. If Jesus has distinct personality from the father, then why the Bible says that all the fullness of the father is in Jesus, proving that Jesus is not distinct person from the father? Col 1:19.

11. If there are distinct personalities in the God Head, then why the Bible says that there is only one throne and one person sitting on it, proving that there are no distinct personalities in the God Head? Rev 4: 2, 21:6.

12. If Jesus has distinct personality from the father, then why the Bible says that Jesus raised Himself from the dead, proving that Jesus is not distinct person from the father? John 2:19.

13. If Jesus has distinct personality from the father, then why the Bible says that he that acknowledges the Son hath the Father also, proving that the Son is not distinct person from the father? 1John 2:23.

14. If Jesus has distinct personality from the father, then why the Bible says that God was in Christ reconciling the world with Himself, proving that Jesus is not distinct person from the father? 2Cor 5:19.

15. If Jesus has distinct personality from the father, then why the Bible says that any one who believes in Jesus believed in the father, proving that Jesus is not distinct aperson from the father? John 12:44.

16. If there is distinct personality in the God Head, then why the Bible teaches that marring more than one person is adultery? Since the Church is the bride, how come we expect our bridegroom (the Almighty God) to be more than one person? Isa 54:5, 2Cor 11:2.

17. If Jesus has distinct personality from the father, then why the Bible says that Jesus is Alfa and Omega, the beginning and the end (Rev 22:12), since this words are supposed to be used strictly for God the father only? Isa 44:6-8.

18. If Jesus has distinct personality from the father, then why the Bible portrays Jesus Himself the king of Israel(God the father, Isa 46:8) and the Son of God, proving the singleness of personality in the God Head and Jesus Himself having the two aspect? John 1:50.

19. If Jesus has distinct personality from the father, then why the Bible teaches that the father dwells in the Son, proving that Jesus is not distinct person from the father? John 14:10.

20. If the Father, Son and Holy Spirit are distinct personalities, then why the Bible says that all scriptures are talking about Jesus, Proving that there is only single personality in the God Head? John 5:39.

In my conclusion, it is not wise to interpret the word of God, completely avoiding what the other part of the Bible is saaying about it. This kind of approach will lead us to force the word of God in order to say only what we want to say. As long as the term trinity does not exist together with the doctrine it stands for, It is simply to be unjust to blame some one for not acknowledging something that does not exist any where in reality. The Bible does not teach distinct personalities in the God Head but it teaches about the father (the invisible aspect of God, Rome 1:20), the Son (the visible aspect of God, Col1:15) and Holy Spirit (God Himself in activity, 1Cor 1:10). It is my humble prayer to the writers of GGNL to understand, acknowledge and humble themselves for the scriptural fact in staid of systematically negating the central truth, strict monotheism and the indivisible one God teaching of the Bible.

.."PREACH THE WORD!!" Not man made logic...

2Timothy 4:2